> I cannot see us trying to focus our energy to support a version of LFS > that is soon to be obsolete. Does anyone disagree with this?
I think the nature of SVN versions is that it's constantly changing. I've always been under the assumption that BLFS-SVN builds according to LFS-SVN, rather than building against a specific version. The need to explicitly disable GDBM in ZSH now that GDBM is in LFS is a good example, which is something that I have already fixed. I think we should build against the development book rather than 6.5, that way we're not constantly playing catch-up; if a major discrepancy arises between the two versions (LFS-stable and LFS-SVN) then we can deal with it when the time comes. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
