> > I cannot see us trying to focus our energy to support a version of LFS > that is soon to be obsolete. Does anyone disagree with this? >
Well, I have a 6.4 desktop which I'm intending to keep for a year or so, (the 2.6.27 kernel is slated for long-term support) but until later in the year I'm unwilling to commit to spending time on the book. Might do a few bits and pieces, might not - depends how real life turns out. OTOH, I don't have any gcc-4.4 systems, and building one will definitely not be a priority - I need to update my own desktop, and I figure that will be a lot easier if I stick with gcc-4.3 for the first attempt. So, if BLFS-dev has to be suitable for LFS-6.5 then I am ruled out of it until the autumn. ĸen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
