> No, it has never been that way. And I cannot see it every being that way. > The goal is to have a "stable" LFS platform, and a matching "stable" > BLFS.
Then I think the foreword of the BLFS book needs to be changed. "This is the development version of the BLFS book. This version of the book is intended to be used when building on top of a system built using the LFS Development book." If we're building to LFS 6.5 then this clearly isn't correct. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
