Ken Moffat wrote these words on 07/18/09 11:20 CST: > So, if BLFS-dev has to be suitable for LFS-6.5 then I am > ruled out of it until the autumn.
Don't worry about that Ken. To be honest, I don't think we have the manpower to get a BLFS release out the door regardless what target environment we shoot for. BLFS may have simply grown out of our ability to keep releases coming. Such is life, I suppose. I don't like it, but there's nothing I can do about it. There was a time in my life I could devote 8 hours a day to BLFS (and enjoyed it, as well), but those days are gone for me. Perhaps it is time to simply bite the bullet and put what we have out on a Wiki and let anyone and everyone contribute. Or just point everyone over to CBLFS. Isn't a 32bit platform becoming almost obsolete anyway? Suggestions welcome. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 14:40:00 up 12 days, 3:08, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
