On 06/26/2010 09:02 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 27/06/10 05:38, DJ Lucas wrote:
> This is why I asked the question about going to 2.30. If BLFS 6.5 where > to be released in the next couple of months, then I would hold off. But > I personally don't see this happening unless we just release a "warts > and all" as Ken mentioned. > I would personally like to work with LFS 6.6 but not with LFS SVN. > I'm good on that noting Ken's comments above. The LTS kernel seems like a really good way to define BLFS's version of LFS. Just have to make sure a version of LFS includes the LTS kernel when they are announced. Need to wait a while, at least until Randy, Bruce, and -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
