On 27/06/10 05:38, DJ Lucas wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The last decision was that we would prepare for BLFS-6.5. I personally > have no interest in working towards a BLFS-6.5 release, but others may > differ. We could create a branch if there is still interest in > continuing along that goal, and now would be a good time that Gnome is > completed and deemed stable. > This is why I asked the question about going to 2.30. If BLFS 6.5 where to be released in the next couple of months, then I would hold off. But I personally don't see this happening unless we just release a "warts and all" as Ken mentioned. I would personally like to work with LFS 6.6 but not with LFS SVN.
> I'd like to start working on current LFS-SVN. I haven't committed > anything in so long because of this and it is about time for a new > desktop build. Still working on my testing server which is somewhere > between 6.6 and current (some package updates to 6.6) so I can commit to > cyrus-sasl, postfix, openldap, samba, php, mysql, openssl, httpd, > dovecot, etc. I do not see that anything will conflict with current SVN > and I'll want to do a rebuild before it goes live anyway. > If it would help to speed up the contributions I think we just should have a free for all, that is just work with whatever version of LFS you have and submit to the BLFS-SVN. If there are any issues picked up due to differences in LFS then a ticket should be raised. Surely the majority of applications should not have problems between differences in LFS. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
