>> Should we consider LibreOffice? > > Last time it came up (as Go-oo who has now rolled into the Libre > envelope -- something akin to the Mozilla Foundation), we had one > objection to Novell's input and mono (which can easily be disabled) and > nobody backing me for it at all. I went back to raw OOo and did a bunch > of builds to verify deps. I'd personally like to go the LibreOffice > route. There are tons of fixes and enhancements in there that are not > part of upstream OOo yet. Also, the build is much easier as we define > the build requirements ourselves (ie: nothing is optional). From a > maintenance standpoint, that is great! Build it once, not a dozen or > more times. > > -- DJ Lucas
LibreOffice looks like the future... from where I am standing. I was thinking of trying my hand at go-oo, just to see what it offers. Also wondering a bit about what OpenOffice's opensource development future is going to hold. -- Nathan Coulson (conathan) ------ Location: Brittish Columbia, Canada Timezone: PST (-8) Webpage: http://www.nathancoulson.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
