"Robert Xu" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:13, DJ Lucas <[email protected]> >wrote: >> On 11/21/2010 06:53 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: >>> DJ Lucas wrote these words on 11/21/10 17:52 CST: >>>> I'm using 20101117 version. Might be pushing it a bit, but I'm sure >I'll >>>> wind up rebuilding anyway at some point. Next question is whether I >>>> should revisit the update to Xorg-7.6. I think I'm going to go >ahead and >>>> push forward with it. A lot of people have been building against >1.9 >>>> already with only one issue to speak of. >>> >>> I can say that what we have in the book right now (pixman must be >updated >>> to support the version of Cairo I am going to update to) works >great. If >>> you want to update, great. I'm ready to seriously think about a >release >>> (without KDE), so do what you feel is best. >>> >> >> Actually, I was really wanting to get Trinity into the release, but I >> haven't used KDE in a *long* time. Might take me a bit to catch my >> bearings, but I imagine I could have my first build done by Tuesday >or >> Wednesday evening. I don't expect the Xorg update to be too invasive. >> I'm also not expecting that Trinity will be all that different from >> KDE-3.5 as far as explanatory and descriptive text is concerned. At >> worst case, I can start on it. If it is not done by time for package >> freeze, then we can simply remove the entire section temporarily (as >> KDE, in its current state, does not build I'm told). >> > >Nope. It does not. >FYI I have dependencies for a minimal Trinity in this order: > >- tqtinterface >- arts >- kdelibs >- kdebase >- kdebindings > >and then whatever you want after that. > >As I mentioned before, you need autoconf 2.63 or lower to generate the >configure files... A real pain. > >{ >cp -Rp <path to your system's libtool.m4 file> admin/libtool.m4.in >cp -Rp <path to your system's ltmain.sh file> admin/ltmain.sh >make -f admin/Makefile.common >} > >Someone is working on a cmake version, but it's not done yet. > >I'm thinking, could we make like a temporary autoconf 2.63 installation >in /opt?
Overkill IMO, but doable. I'd rather just regenerate the files and distribute, though it would be cool to show how to use a local copy. Also, what is wrong that newer autoconf can't do the job? --DJ Lucas -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
