On 11/21/2010 01:55 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote these words on 11/19/10 18:00 CST: >> Sorry to resurrect a 15 day old thread, but are we set in stone on 6.7 >> then? It is unfortunate, but I've just started on current SVN thinking >> we were shooting for a 6.8 simultaneous release. > > I don't think there is enough difference to worry about. I did the same > thing, but stuck with it. I'm building and testing against > LFS-20101029. The choice is up to you, but you might want to compare > the toolchain and see if there is any difference to speak of. I know > I used a 2.6.36 kernel, hoping that it won't cause breakage to a true > LFS-6.7 system. >
I'm using 20101117 version. Might be pushing it a bit, but I'm sure I'll wind up rebuilding anyway at some point. Next question is whether I should revisit the update to Xorg-7.6. I think I'm going to go ahead and push forward with it. A lot of people have been building against 1.9 already with only one issue to speak of. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
