On 11/05/2010 12:18 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: >> >> And what version should we target? I see there being two choices. Target >> for 6.7 and release as soon as we can. Or, target for 6.8 and coincide >> our release with the next LFS release. >> > I'd prefer to target 6.7 and "as soon as we can". From what I've > seen on the LFS changelogs, I think the current changes since 6.7 > will only have a small impact on BLFS. I assume 6.8 will have both > a newer gcc and a newer glibc, which might require everything to be > retested again.
Sorry to resurrect a 15 day old thread, but are we set in stone on 6.7 then? It is unfortunate, but I've just started on current SVN thinking we were shooting for a 6.8 simultaneous release. Obviously I did not read this thread as close a I had thought I had. :-) I'm not that far and LFS only takes about 2 hours to build now days (I have all the post-install tasks in a single shell script that takes about 3 seconds to run) so not a big deal if I should start over, however, if we are shooting for 6.7 + errata, I'll want to rebuild. Also, need to add glibc and patch to LFS errata. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
