On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:46:36PM -0400, Jonathan Oksman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Randy McMurchy
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd just like to mention that I mildly disagree on both counts,
> > especially Subversion. For instance, we use Subversion to track
> > the changes of our own books, which has nothing to do with
> > programming. I could name other instances where I use Subversion
> > for tracking changes to things other than programs.
> >
> > And yes, you could make a case that TCP Wrappers could belong in
> > security, but it *is* a networking package. It is all about access
> > and control of networks.
> >
> > Just my thoughts.
> >
> 
> I think I agree with Randy about subversion, it's a project management
> and version control system (although it is used for programming a
> lot).  the wrappers are useless outside of a networking context but it
> is definitely security related.  I think it could definitely fit in
> with the security section but it does fit in both sections nicely.
> It's more of a candidate for relocation if you ask me.
> 
> While we're on the subject, I noticed recently that cmake is in the
> system utilities section.  It's intended use is as a build system for
> programming, so it could be argued that it does belong in the
> programming section.  It's a language for describing the build process
> of languages to compilers.
> 
> Some packages are tricky to define into categories...
> 
> 
> Jonathan
 I agree that version-control packages are used for a lot more than
programming, and that tcp wrappers can be in either place.  But for
cmake, I have to mildly disagree (mildly, because I no-longer build
it, and would need extremely strong reasons to build it again) -
in linux, it's a replacement for 'configure'.  The only reason to
include it in the book is because a few packages require it.  It's
better described as "a build system for programs (that want to be
able to run on windows)" :-)

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to