Jonathan Oksman wrote:
> While we're on the subject, I noticed recently that cmake is in the
> system utilities section. It's intended use is as a build system for
> programming, so it could be argued that it does belong in the
> programming section. It's a language for describing the build process
> of languages to compilers.
I haven't finished moving things around. I agree that cmake goes in
programming. There are others:
d-bus: General Libraries -> System Utilities
{,un}zip: System Utilities -> General Libraries
pkg-config -> Programming
etc.
I'd be glad to discuss this more.
> Some packages are tricky to define into categories...
True.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
