On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:08:52 +0000 Andrew Benton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:33:55 -0600 > Todd Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I tried to build gtk+-3.2.2 on my LFS 7.0 system and the configure > > script failed, with a message that I needed pango-1.29.0 or later. I > > had pango-1.28.2 because that's what the BLFS book said was needed. > > > > I downloaded pango-1.29.4 and it compiled and tested OK, and after > > installing it, gtk+-3.2.2 could be built. > > Yes, I think you're right. I'll update pango tomorrow I'm starting to have second thoughts about this. I looked at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pango which says that the current stable version of Pango is 1.29.5 but then I looked at http://www.gtk.org/documentation.php and the links there seem to suggest that pango-1.29 is unstable and pango-1.28 is the stable series. Personally I've been using pango-1.29.3 for months and I'm not aware of any bus in it, but then I'm English and Pango is for laying out international text. So what do people think, is it Ok to put pango-1.29 in the book? gtk+-3.2 requires pango-1.29. gtk+-3.2.2 is the current stable version of gtk+-3. It's a contradiction. Advice please. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
