On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:50:35PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote: > On 12/04/2011 01:15 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > > On 04/12/11 15:30, Ken Moffat wrote: > > >> What's stopping you > >> putting all this into the book ? > > It's incomplete. Most of it, were you see the ??, need to have their > > dependencies reviewed, and there is a lot of placeholders for the > > description text with the new packages. I've found it a battle to keep > > up with the minor revisions. I don't think I have the time to do all > > this. I could just dump all the stuff as is, and let other people update > > the individual pages as required? Let me know if there is any objections > > to this approach. > > > I personally like that approach, but devil's advocate and all...would it > break what is there now? Quite frankly, I don't care if it breaks the > book for a short time in order to update a good 20% of the book in one > lump sum! So, strictly my own opinion, pick a block of time and > everybody else can get out of your way. :-) Or, if you haven't the time, > send a diff and somebody else can do the same. > > > As it stands, if you follow the gnome 3.2 build, it should be successful. > > > > Well, I'll let you know by Wed night (hopefully). :-) > Well, I certainly won't be following the full build. But it's already *very* useful in looking at dependencies for the things I do intend to build.
I can't see that this will break anything outside gnome-2, so I support dropping it in. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
