On 04/12/11 04:13, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 02:20:32AM +0000, Andrew Benton wrote: >>> So what do people think, is it Ok to put pango-1.29 in the book? >>> gtk+-3.2 requires pango-1.29. gtk+-3.2.2 is the current stable version >>> of gtk+-3. It's a contradiction. Advice please. >>> >> It's required for gtk+-3.2.2. 1.29.4 is good enough to build that, >> but 1.29.5 needs a development glibc. >> >> The whole upstream transition from gnome-2 to gnome-3 still looks >> very messy. I started working through apparent dependencies last >> night, starting at the end : gnome-media looks as if it will be >> stuck in gtk2 for ever, but apparently there is a replacement that >> uses pulse (- will try that in the future, but for now there are too >> many other things I need to test in-use). Totem is at 3.2.1 but >> requires totem-pl-parser which is still at 2.32.6. > > Does it make sense to hold at gnome-2 for a few months until gnome-3 > settles down? > > -- Bruce >
gnome-media is no longer part of Gnome3 (as of 3.2). The next release of Gnome will be next March. If anyone is interested, here is my current build for Gnome3: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~wblaszcz/blfs-book-xsl/index.html Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
