On 04/04/2012 10:31 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 04/04/12 09:56, DJ Lucas wrote: >> On 04/03/2012 06:36 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: >>> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:07:23 +0100 >>> "Armin K."<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Great. And then everyone told me how /etc/gnome and prefix other than >>>> /usr can work. Well, yes they can. But there is a lot of additional >>>> configuration that needs to be done, and also I still haven't found a >>>> way to make policykit rules installed somewhere else than in /usr >>>> available to the daemon. So, I am asking again. If everyone else agrees, >>>> I'd like to drop GNOME_SYSCONFDIR - lot easier than making symlinks and >>>> if possible GNOME_PREFIX or keep it with fat warning that it might break >>>> things (that is if anyone wants to test if that works, I'm not going to >>>> do that). >>> As I've said before, I agree with you. I think GNOME_SYSCONFDIR should >>> be /etc, GNOME_PREFIX should be /usr. >>> >>> Andy >> Add a third. See the bugs I just posted in the libexec thread. All >> related and avoidable by using /usr as the prefix and standard libexec dirs. >> >> -- DJ Lucas >> >> > Add a forth. It seems to me that the people who are apposed to this are > the people who don't really use Gnome? > I agree with what you said. I prefer to have something that is fully > functional rather than just buildable. > Wayne. >
Wayne, I agree with you. It is not just the point of building, but of the functionality. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
