Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> --- Em dom, 4/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
>> De: Bruce Dubbs
>> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc
>> Para: "BLFS Development List" <blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org>
>> Data: Domingo, 4 de Novembro de 2012, 22:58
>> Perhaps we should promote gtk-doc to recommended, but I can
>> see where
>> users really don't care about installing the
>> documentation.  Some
>> packages will assume it, but others not.  The only
>> other solution I can
>> see is to address the issue package by package as needed.
> Bruce, I think your simple solution is best: "promote gtk-doc to
> recommended", with a small parenthesis telling about possible future
> install problems, if not installed, or something like that.

I went back and looked at my log and it does not indicate the problem 
you have.  From my log:

checking whether to build gtk-doc documentation... no
test -z "/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl" || /bin/mkdir -p 
install: creating directory '/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl/images'
'docs/images/GEGL.png' -> '/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl/images/GEGL.png'

I don't think your issue is caused by gtk-doc.

   -- Bruce

FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to