Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > --- Em dom, 4/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > >> De: Bruce Dubbs >> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc >> Para: "BLFS Development List" <blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> >> Data: Domingo, 4 de Novembro de 2012, 22:58 > > >> Perhaps we should promote gtk-doc to recommended, but I can >> see where >> users really don't care about installing the >> documentation. Some >> packages will assume it, but others not. The only >> other solution I can >> see is to address the issue package by package as needed. > > Bruce, I think your simple solution is best: "promote gtk-doc to > recommended", with a small parenthesis telling about possible future > install problems, if not installed, or something like that.
I went back and looked at my log and it does not indicate the problem you have. From my log: checking whether to build gtk-doc documentation... no ... test -z "/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl" || /bin/mkdir -p "/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl" ... install: creating directory '/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl/images' 'docs/images/GEGL.png' -> '/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gegl/images/GEGL.png' ... I don't think your issue is caused by gtk-doc. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
