--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. <kre...@email.com> escreveu:
> De: Armin K. <kre...@email.com>
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
> Para: "BLFS Development List" <blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org>
> Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:01
> Dana 13.11.2012 21:43, Fernando de
> Oliveira je napisao:
> > --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu:
> >
> >> De: Armin K. <kre...@email.com>
> >> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
> >> Para: "BLFS Development List"
> >> Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 16:33
> >> On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de
> >> Oliveira wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed,
> so
> >> libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and installed
> properly.
> >>>
> >>> Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole build
> log to
> >> just the first unfinished one and attached, perhaps
> it will
> >> be enough.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Apparently you were missing either glib pkg-config
> files
> >> (.pc ones) or
> >> development headers. This was error in your
> config.log
> >>
> >> configure:12019: checking for GLIB - version >=
> 2.33.1
> >> configure:12152: result: no
> >> configure:12180: gcc -o conftest -g -O2
> >> conftest.c >&5
> >> conftest.c:24:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file
> or
> >> directory
> >>
> >> Glad you've fixed it.
> >
> > Thanks, Armin, for your attention.
> >
> > But they both are there (I left VMWLFS7.1 with libsoup
> in its older
> > version for a while, to discuss better this matter):
> >
> > $ find /usr -name glib.h -exec ls -lh {} \; -o
> -name glib\*.pc -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3,3K Mai 8 2012
> /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 392 Mai 8 2012
> /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 579 Abr 17 2012
> /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glibmm-2.4.pc
> >
> > Problem was with the version, as I understood in the
> first reference to
> > the error. That is the reason I upgraded it, so fixed
> the problem.
> >
> > My real question is related to the libsoup's "Required"
> section in the
> > book.
> >
> > If a package A cannot be built for some dependency B is
> missing or
> > obsolete, should not it be included as required
> directly?
> >
> > I did not need to upgrade any other dependency, just
> glib-2.32.3 to
> > glib-2.34.1.
> >
> > []s,
> > Fernando
> >
>
> It really depends on a package. If you are upgrading, I
> suggest that you
> upgrade everything or you might get strange results at
> runtime.
>
> Required packages ARE required, recommended are recommended
> and you're
> on your own if you don't install some of them. The
> instructions are
> originaly meant to pick up where LFS left off, so we set
> dependencies
> according to it.
Sorry, I have not made myself clear yet:
I am just following the book. But libsoup could not be installed without
glib.
I think glib should be *required* in libsoup. It cannot be built without
glib. At this moment, it is not in the required list in that page.
Configure script looks for it.
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
