--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> De: Fernando de Oliveira
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
> Para: "BLFS Development List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:26
> --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K.
> escreveu:
>
> > De: Armin K.
> > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
> > Para: "BLFS Development List"
> > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:01
> > Dana 13.11.2012 21:43, Fernando de
> > Oliveira je napisao:
> > > --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu:
> > >
> > >> De: Armin K.
> > >> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
> > >> Para: "BLFS Development List"
> > >> Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012,
> 16:33
> > >> On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de
> > >> Oliveira wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1
> installed,
> > so
> > >> libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and
> installed
> > properly.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole
> build
> > log to
> > >> just the first unfinished one and attached,
> perhaps
> > it will
> > >> be enough.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Apparently you were missing either glib
> pkg-config
> > files
> > >> (.pc ones) or
> > >> development headers. This was error in your
> > config.log
> > >>
> > >> configure:12019: checking for GLIB - version
> >=
> > 2.33.1
> > >> configure:12152: result: no
> > >> configure:12180: gcc -o conftest -g -O2
> > >> conftest.c >&5
> > >> conftest.c:24:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such
> file
> > or
> > >> directory
> > >>
> > >> Glad you've fixed it.
> > >
> > > Thanks, Armin, for your attention.
> > >
> > > But they both are there (I left VMWLFS7.1 with
> libsoup
> > in its older
> > > version for a while, to discuss better this
> matter):
> > >
> > > $ find /usr -name glib.h -exec ls -lh {} \; -o
> > -name glib\*.pc -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3,3K Mai 8 2012
> > /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 392 Mai 8 2012
> > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 579 Abr 17 2012
> > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glibmm-2.4.pc
> > >
> > > Problem was with the version, as I understood in
> the
> > first reference to
> > > the error. That is the reason I upgraded it, so
> fixed
> > the problem.
> > >
> > > My real question is related to the libsoup's
> "Required"
> > section in the
> > > book.
> > >
> > > If a package A cannot be built for some dependency
> B is
> > missing or
> > > obsolete, should not it be included as required
> > directly?
> > >
> > > I did not need to upgrade any other dependency,
> just
> > glib-2.32.3 to
> > > glib-2.34.1.
> > >
> > > []s,
> > > Fernando
> > >
> >
> > It really depends on a package. If you are upgrading,
> I
> > suggest that you
> > upgrade everything or you might get strange results at
> > runtime.
> >
> > Required packages ARE required, recommended are
> recommended
> > and you're
> > on your own if you don't install some of them. The
> > instructions are
> > originaly meant to pick up where LFS left off, so we
> set
> > dependencies
> > according to it.
>
> Sorry, I have not made myself clear yet:
>
> I am just following the book. But libsoup could not be
> installed without
> glib.
>
> I think glib should be *required* in libsoup. It cannot be
> built without
> glib. At this moment, it is not in the required list in that
> page.
>
> Configure script looks for it.
>
Now, if you tell me that I am wrong, glib is not required directly or
something like this with the reason, I will thank you very much for
educating me.
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
