Em 17-02-2014 16:33, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> >> icedtea install OK without lsb_release >> >> icedtea does not install OK if lsb_release accidentally was installed, >> but the user did not configure it in LFS. >> >> Problem is the divide in configuring before installing, in LFS >> (optional), but nothing being written about configuration in BLFS. > > Add a sed to the lsb_release install instructions: > > sed -i "s|n/a|unavailable|" lsb_release > > Also add a note about configuration and point to LFS. > > If it's really necessary, we can create an LFS specific lsb-release-1.5 > tarball. But I think that's overkill. It really is only a bash script > and a man page generated from the script. OK, thanks. But I see you have already taken the ticket, thanks again. BTW, I think that $ lsb_release -v LSB Version: n/a comes from the use of the switch --alt_version_key=program_version but I am not sure. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
