Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 17-02-2014 14:34, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > >> I do not know the icedtea installer, so I do not know how >> it gets its information about the LSB. But I think the best >> would be to consider that everything, which is in LFS, is installed >> (including /etc/lsb-release), and that lsb-release executable is >> optional. Ideally, then, the icedtea installer should be taught >> not to use the executable. Now, if the executable is needed >> for an easier installation of icedtea-JDK, then it should go to >> recommended. > > Once more: > > icedtea install OK without lsb_release > > icedtea does not install OK if lsb_release accidentally was installed, > but the user did not configure it in LFS. > > Problem is the divide in configuring before installing, in LFS > (optional), but nothing being written about configuration in BLFS.
Add a sed to the lsb_release install instructions: sed -i "s|n/a|unavailable|" lsb_release Also add a note about configuration and point to LFS. If it's really necessary, we can create an LFS specific lsb-release-1.5 tarball. But I think that's overkill. It really is only a bash script and a man page generated from the script. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
