On 02/21/2014 06:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: > >> I'm only one person and keeping up with LFS which is at least 10 times >> smaller and making sure it's perfect is hard enough. > > That's an understatement. > >> BLFS requires >> modifications to more packages than the entire LFS has. Easiest approach >> would be for both instructions to co-exist, with some kinds of >> role="systemd" xml tags to indicate it's required for systemd and >> role=sysvinit to indicate it's required for sysv (mostly configuration >> parts). but I believe it has been said once that BLFS should not mix >> instructions for those two books, so I'm not going to try. > > I don't have a problem with using role to generate two versions of the > book from the same source. It will take a lot of up front work though. > > -- Bruce >
No, it's not two versions of the book, but one version with "Do this if you are using sysvinit and do this if you are using systemd". I believe it was you who said that we shouldn't mix those when Ragnar suggested it back ... ugh long time ago anyways. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
