Em 21-02-2014 18:04, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > Em 21-02-2014 16:34, akhiezer escreveu: > > >> Had expected here that there _would_ be two separate xml trees, at least >> for foreseeable, like for lfs. And then in time see how 'clean' the diffs >> between the two can be; and from there if want to merge. > > Thanks, akhiezer. Tha is exactly what i think. > > What I wrote before is differences between LFS and LFS systemd should be > also in LFS and BLFS systemd: one of the differences is two separate trees. > > I am *completely* against BLFS systemd inside BLFS tree.
If mixing sysvint and systemd in the same tree works for LFS, then a _discussion_ to do the same with BLFS is acceptable. A discussion to decide if BLFS will be based only in systemd is acceptable. The status quo is acceptable. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
