Armin K. wrote: > On 02/21/2014 06:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Armin K. wrote: >> >>> I'm only one person and keeping up with LFS which is at least 10 times >>> smaller and making sure it's perfect is hard enough. >> >> That's an understatement. >> >>> BLFS requires >>> modifications to more packages than the entire LFS has. Easiest approach >>> would be for both instructions to co-exist, with some kinds of >>> role="systemd" xml tags to indicate it's required for systemd and >>> role=sysvinit to indicate it's required for sysv (mostly configuration >>> parts). but I believe it has been said once that BLFS should not mix >>> instructions for those two books, so I'm not going to try. >> >> I don't have a problem with using role to generate two versions of the >> book from the same source. It will take a lot of up front work though.
> No, it's not two versions of the book, but one version with "Do this if > you are using sysvinit and do this if you are using systemd". I believe > it was you who said that we shouldn't mix those when Ragnar suggested it > back ... ugh long time ago anyways. What I said, or at least intended to say, was that users shouldn't be constantly reminded that "if you have x, do y, otherwise z". I don't have an objection to doing that in the source by developers and creating the xsl to generate a 'standard' blfs version and a 'systemd' blfs version. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
