Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 02:41:33AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 07:04:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Adding the /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-intel.conf file as in the current book
did allow Xorg to come up.
Thanks. I've just started to build/test gcc with the
upstream_fixes-1 patch.
Looking at the output from 'make check', it ends with
Makefile:2234: recipe for target 'do-check' failed
make: *** [do-check] Error 2
make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors.
status was 2
That is not unexpected. But the log before that shows results from
running in libbacktrace and libiberty, and nothing more. In
particular, no 'FAIL' messages and no 'unexpected'.
Normally, I run ../gcc-5.1.0/contrib/test_summary but that is giving
me no output at all. ??? This is from upgrading gcc on the existing
system.
Also, the build and tests completed in just over 10 minutes, which
is a lot less than I was expecting (SandyBridge i3, -j4). Colour me
baffled and very much wishing I'd never touched this.
On a jhalfs build, I got:
FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand
"\\(call [^\\n]* acc_on_device" 0
FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand
"\\\\(call [^\\\\n]* acc_on_device" 0
But I only saw one "unexpected failure", but two "unexpected successes".
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 93236
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 339
# of unsupported tests 3645
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 113975
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 259
# of unsupported tests 1789
[gcc-5.1.0]
Build time is: 51 minutes and 47 seconds at -j4. i7-4700MQ CPU @ 2.40GHz
I don't think you actually got the tests to run. Did you have dejagnu installed
or /tools/bin in your PATH?
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
