On 14.07.2015 23:53, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 14.07.2015 23:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Ken Moffat wrote: >>> >>>> Unfortunately, I seem to have another problem with qt-5.5.0 : I'm >>>> using MAKEFLAGS of "-j4 -O" but the build is not exceeding more than >>>> 100% CPU according to 'top' (instead of the intended 400%). It took >>>> over 6 hours to get to that failure, so I think the indication of >>>> only one CPU is correct. ... >>> >>> qt5 takes a very long time. I put 90 SBU in the book. For me that's about >>> 2.5 hours. I do have a script that uses -j10, but unfortunately, I >>> overwrote that log, but IIRC it was about 20 SBU. > >> I suppose 90 SBU was without the webengine? I measured with webengine and >> it almost exceeded libreoffice - about 160 SBU with make -j1. > > Yes, it was without webengine. I don't know of any current use for it. > > -- Bruce >
Well, nothing uses it just yet. But, kdepim from git (frameworks port) uses it. And qtwebkit is deprecated and going away in 5.6 or 5.7, so everything will probably need to be ported to qtwebengine anyways. We should look at building modular Qt5, not from a single source. I may, at least for BLFS systemd. It could give me a nice overview of what module depends on what dependency, could save some time and space by ommiting unneeded modules such as qtwebkit and qtwebengine if KDE isn't desired. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
