On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:27:38AM +0200, Armin K. wrote: > On 15.07.2015 00:16, Ken Moffat wrote: > > When I first built qt5, a few months ago, I used it to build > > qupzilla as my backup browser. And that needed whatever the web > > part was called at that time. So yes, I know how long the "reduced" > > and "with the web thingy" builds take (I'm not sure if webengine is > > the same thing that was in that older version). > > > > I suppose you are talking about QtWebKit. Yes, that's still part of > Qt5, but it's soon going away in favor of QtWebEngine. > Yes, that was it! I'm really not very good at this [ deliberately echoing the captain of the B Ark in hhg2tg ]
> QtWebKit and QtWebEngine are not one and the same - they are different > components which seem to do similar thing, just in a different way. > So that version would not, in any case, have been useful to me for qupzilla. I stand corrected. > QtWebKit is a port of WebKit browser engine to Qt platform while > QtWebEngine is port of Chromium's/Chrome's browser engine (Blink, > which is itself a fork of WebKit) to the Qt platform. > So, I'll blame google for the build failure (I could not possibly blame the gcc devs ;) I left the attempt to compile qt with 4.2.0-rc2 while I had something to eat - I'm sure it will still be compiling when I get back to it, even if it is now using all the processors. ĸen -- This one goes up to eleven! -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
