On 15.07.2015 00:46, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:27:38AM +0200, Armin K. wrote: >> On 15.07.2015 00:16, Ken Moffat wrote: >>> When I first built qt5, a few months ago, I used it to build >>> qupzilla as my backup browser. And that needed whatever the web >>> part was called at that time. So yes, I know how long the "reduced" >>> and "with the web thingy" builds take (I'm not sure if webengine is >>> the same thing that was in that older version). >>> >> >> I suppose you are talking about QtWebKit. Yes, that's still part of >> Qt5, but it's soon going away in favor of QtWebEngine. >> > Yes, that was it! I'm really not very good at this [ deliberately > echoing the captain of the B Ark in hhg2tg ] > >> QtWebKit and QtWebEngine are not one and the same - they are different >> components which seem to do similar thing, just in a different way. >> > > So that version would not, in any case, have been useful to me for > qupzilla. I stand corrected. > >> QtWebKit is a port of WebKit browser engine to Qt platform while >> QtWebEngine is port of Chromium's/Chrome's browser engine (Blink, >> which is itself a fork of WebKit) to the Qt platform. >> > > So, I'll blame google for the build failure (I could not possibly > blame the gcc devs ;) >
It's a GCC change that broke the build. GCC devs fixed the default behavior in later GCC-5.0 snapshot and GCC-6.0. > I left the attempt to compile qt with 4.2.0-rc2 while I had > something to eat - I'm sure it will still be compiling when I get > back to it, even if it is now using all the processors. > > ĸen > -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
