On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:39:57AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Thanks to both of you.
> 
> Trying to reply to all posts in this one, please see below.
> 
[...]
> >>>
> >>> Now, I have a working link:
> >>>
> >>> [http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~fernando/sddm/themes/lfs.tar.xz]
> >>>
> >> Unfortunately, I cannot test it on my latest build: any attempt to
> >> use sddm, or to run sddm-greeter -test /path/to/theme, just gives me
> >> a white screen.
> 
> Ken, you need to use:
> 
> sddm-greeter --test-mode --theme <theme path>
> 

> Found it at
> 
> $ sddm-greeter --help
> Usage: sddm-greeter [options] [arguments]
> Options:
>   --theme <theme path>       Set greeter theme
>   --socket <socket name>     Set socket name
>   --test-mode                Start greeter in test mode
> 
> Thought that just --test worked, but it tries to start sddm, but it also
> tries to start the daemon:
> 

It certainly used to, and messages about the daemon not running are
normal - at least, normal if you are  not logged in via sddm.
> [08:45:24.880] (EE) GREETER: Cannot connect to the daemon - is it running?
> 
> This may be a source of some of your test problems.
> 
> 
> Em 19-08-2015 20:51, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:45:52AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:07:59PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> 
> OK. But here we consider wrong the tarball and directory having
> different names. So, I will also rename the directory.
> 
> >
> > And after going back to it, a third comment - the left edge of the
> > gnu, and the left edge of the L in Linux, are hard up against the
> > edge of the screen.  For the L, that makes it slightly uncomfortable
> > to read.  Mind you, the font used for 'from scratch' is pretty ugly
> > at this size (thin, and seems vertically flattened).
> >
> > ĸen
> >
> 
> 
> Perhaps it is because I cropped out the copyright (more on this below).
> 
> Em 19-08-2015 20:45, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:07:59PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >>
> >> One initial comment : although lfs/ is correct for the theme name,
> >> a tarball name of just lfs is perhaps not ideal.  There seems to be
> >> some agreement that external themes should be called sddm-name-theme.
> >> My own should probably be repackaged to contain a speckledwood/
> >> directory, with all the files in that.
> >>
> > Second comment (tried it on my other box with the 1600x1200 screen):
> > I get a grey bar along the top of the screen, which purports to let
> > me change the session and the keyboard.  Didn't try the keyboard,
> > but changing the session there did nothing (i.e. I changed it from
> > LXQt to icewm, but got LXQt again).  It was only when I remembered
> > that the central box came from elarun, and the session is there
> > hidden on the first icon of hte bottom row, that I managed to get
> > icewm.
> 
> Changing sessions works for me. Not it does not work. You are correct. I
> don't know how to fix.
> 

Been there, had the same problem in my early attempts, in the end I
started from a different theme so that I could get rid of the grey
bar along the top.  Never did manage to work out where it was coming
from.

> I've chosen elarun, because the lfs image has the two things occupying
> most part of the screen and elarun had a small box that fitted in between.
> 
> >
> > I had thought that the low height (1080p) might be a problem, but at
> > the moment it is not.  Like elarun (and also like the attribution in
> > text showing the copyright in the png which Bruce provided), the text
> > is unreadable - at the bottom of the central box I suppose it is
> > reporting the day.
> 
> I cropped out the Copyright. Was almost unreadable and looked like some
> dirt in the image.
> 
> Yes, it is the day. Needed to decrease the size, because here:
> 
> Qui Ago 20 09:01:27 BRT 2015
> 
> and it was displayed over the buttons. That was the only solution I
> found, after many unsuccessful attempts.
> 
> Em 20-08-2015 01:54, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> >
> > To me that means that the image is resized incorrectly.
> 
> I would like to understand what you mean by that.
> 
> I have:
> 
> $ cd /usr/share/sddm/themes/lfs/
> $ file lfs.jpg images/background.png
> lfs.jpg:               JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, resolution
> (DPI), density 96x96, segment length 16, progressive, precision 8,
> 1680x1050, frames 3
> images/background.png: PNG image data, 1920 x 1080, 8-bit/color RGBA,
> non-interlaced
> 
> I need a PNG with the name background.png
> 
> The other one, lfs.jpg, is only used for a user to check with an image
> viewer how the theme looks, and is generated by running
> 
> sddm-greeter --test-mode --theme /usr/share/sddm/themes/lfs
> 
> and making a screenshot.
> 
> > The image in
> > Fernando's tarball is 1580x1050 and resizing to 1600x1200 is not working
> > properly.  In addition the image has artificts that should not be there.
> 
> The artifact were introduced, because after resizing, the image loses
> sharpness (is this the correct word in English?), so I ran gimp's
> "selective gaussian blur filter", with
> 
> blur radius   = 5.00
> maximum delta = 50
> > 
> > If you want I can send you a properly scaled 1600x1200 jpeg to try.
> > 
> >   -- Bruce
> > 
> 
> But ISTR that I had the same problem as Ken, of things moving to the
> borders too much, with different sizes. Will test with 1600x1200
> 

The important thing is that the screen looks ok on "supported"
screen sizes - it gets scaled, or cropped, to fit depending on the
option in Main.qml - my own image just-about works on 1600x900, but
the edge of the butterfly is under the central box.

1600x1200 is not very common, some smaller sizes are.

> I only did this attempt, because I think it would be good having a
> (B)LFS theme, as it would also for lxdm.
> 
> But I consider it a failure.
> 

I don't consider it a failure.

ĸen
-- 
This one goes up to eleven: but only on a clear day, with the wind in
the right direction.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to