On 09/28/2018 02:37 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:07:36PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
For that, I applied the seds to a copy of the OLD tree, to get a
patch that I could look at.
A comparison to the new tree showed what seemed to be the same block
of code, but further down. This is why I say that whilst using
patches doesn't allow editors to show off their leet sed skillz, it
is much easier to carry forward.
In this case, I agree. Please go ahead and put your patch into the repo.
I recreated it (the original was temporary because I could see how
to change the sed), applied to 0.42.0 to check I was not telling
porkies about expecting it to apply (simples, just offset of 7),
rediffed so it will currently apply with 0 offset.
Without looking, no idea who to attribute the original sed to, so
I've just gone for 'BLFS'.
I did the original seds, but have no need for attribution. BLFS is fine.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
