Hello Suggestions/proposals
CVS version (future BLFS-8.4, Part of BBLFS?) 1) Use sendmail-8.16. it is working with openssl-1.1 (it is in production here). adjustment to build are very minimal: APPENDDEF(`confENVDEF',`-DNEWDB -DSTARTTLS -DSASL -DLDAPMAP')APPENDDEF(`confLIBS', `-lssl -lcrypto -lsasl2 -lldap -llber -ldb -lresolv')
APPENDDEF(`confINCDIRS', `-I /usr/include -I/usr/include/sasl')
diff -> (-NEWDB, -lresolv)
2) To replace heirloom-mailx with s-nail.
snail is compatible with openssl-1.1, seems to be
a fork of heirloom-mailx.
mailx project itself seems to be in coma, while
s-nail-14.9.11 was release in 2018-08-08.
s-nail is working within production here (but not tested
in deep details).
3) Add lshw, little tool to probe details about desktop/server
hardware components. Make procedure is rather simple.
Command line version and GUI version both available.
4) Bind-9.13
Why not use bind-9.13?
compiled 9.13.2, found no difference with building book
directives.
only difference
# rndc-confgen -r /dev/urandom -b 512
rndc-confgen: The -r option has been deprecated.
# rndc-confgen -b 512
is working fine.
bind-9.13.4 was released 2 days ago (2018/11/22)
Generated LFS-8.3-1.9.0-rescue-x86_64.iso
available within
www.osukiss.org -> download
(build/sources included :-})
--
A bientôt
===========================================================
Jean-Marc Pigeon E-Mail: [email protected]
===========================================================
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
