Hello, On 11/15/2018 10:04 AM, Stephen Berman wrote: [....]
Trouble ahead compiling sendmail (and other?) using opessl-1.1.1? Comments?, something I am overlooking?I don't think so but do try to compile sendmail with openssl-1.0.2p. I'm pretty sure it will work fine :)No. I am very doubtful you can have both openssl-1.0.2p and openssl-1.1.1 within the same system.I can dispell your doubts. As I reported in response to your OP (see http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2018-November/035071.html), I have built and use sendmail in BLFS 8.3, i.e. sendmail-8.15 with openssl-1.0.2p. I've also installed openssl-1.1.1. I've noticed no problems. (My reply also went to [email protected] but it bounced, so it if Jean-Marc is not following the list, he'll have missed it; perhaps someone can point him to the list archive.) Steve Berman
Ok... Hmmm, rather reluctant to have 2 libraries named openssl and as critical to applications. Meaning (lets say) sendmail is using openssl-1.0 and openssh using openssl-1.1 within the same packaging set. As you don't know which application is using what, difficult to assess a library bug impact on application. According my understanding, openssl-1.0 won't be "alive" after 2019 (one year from now). Better to move to openssl-1.1. no? -- A bientôt =========================================================== Jean-Marc Pigeon E-Mail: [email protected] SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280 Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last) Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca";> ===========================================================
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
