Bonjour Alain, On 11/15/2018 09:24 AM, Alain Toussaint via blfs-dev wrote:
Le jeudi 15 novembre 2018 à 09:09 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev a écrit :Hello,As reported earlier, I am not able to recompile sendmail-8.15.2. It is not fully proved but I have strong indication it is caused by openssl-1.1.[0i,1] Looking about this, I noticed LFS is openssl-1.1.1 BLFS is openssl-1.0.2p (LFS 2018-11-09, BLFS 2018-11-13) Is this done on purpose? (I am doubtful about it)There are two version of openssl because some software in BLFS are not able to work with openssl 1.1, sendmail being one of them, ref: https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/2016-June/003897.html
OK then, there is confirmation sendmail-8.15 and openssl-1.1 are not compatible.
Trouble ahead compiling sendmail (and other?) using opessl-1.1.1? Comments?, something I am overlooking?I don't think so but do try to compile sendmail with openssl-1.0.2p. I'm pretty sure it will work fine :)
No. I am very doubtful you can have both openssl-1.0.2p and openssl-1.1.1 within the same system. And "Beyond LFS" is done over LFS (using all tools/components from LFS). So the solution is to move BLFS to sendmail-8.16.X so fare 8.16 is not available from ftp.sendmail.org, where is the "mythical" 8.16 version hidden?
Alain
-- A bientôt =========================================================== Jean-Marc Pigeon E-Mail: [email protected] SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280 Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last) Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca";> ===========================================================
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
