Hello Bruce, On 11/15/2018 12:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
It appears that Jean-Marc did not look a the sendmail instructions in
BLFS. To me it is pretty obvious that everything is installed in
/usr/{lib,include}/openssl-1.0.
You are absolutely right.I overlooked the real meaning and implication of the "site.config.m4 " directive, my mistake.
Keep in mind, IMHO, LFS is the solid rock on which BLFS is build. So there is (should be) only one working components with the same name. (well... we have example of gtk2+ and gtk3, perl..., but at least they are not pretending to be the exact same name). Interestingly enough. heirloom-mailx_12.5 is compiling, no alarm, without openssl-1.0 installed. (with the current BLFS sed directives), most likely the compiled mailx is a "plain" one, but it is still able to send email. I can't say for KF5 as I didn't try to compile them.
I would like to remove openssl-1.0 from BLFS, but currently it is still needed for qca, kf5, mailx, and sendmail. Of these, mailx is the oldest at April 2011 and sendmail is from March 2016. -- Bruce
-- A bientôt =========================================================== Jean-Marc Pigeon E-Mail: [email protected] SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280 Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last) Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca";> ===========================================================
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
