On 08/06/2019 09:38 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 06/08/2019 15:03, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:Hello,According web page about libvpx-1.8.1, using yasm is mandatory because: "compiling with NASM-2.14.02 is currently broken" I have seen no difference (naked eyes) between using nasm-2.14.02 or yasm-1.3.0 Both build appear to be successful. Could someone elaborate about "currently broken".Hmmm, Looks like this sentence has been added by andy at revision 9049 in 2011. I'd say the exact meaning of "currently broken" is: "At a time between the introduction of that page into the book and present, it has been broken. And it is possible that nobody have tested since then." ;)
No problem.
Actually, it is not easy to test that: at a point in nasm life, or libvpx life, a release allowed compiling libvpx against nasm again, and now you see that. But owing to the heavy work on updating the book, it is too time consuming to test that all packages work against all their dependencies, specially when those dependencies have been disabled...
Then.. lets consider I tested it, ;) May I suggest to update book, keeping "yasm requirement" and removing "currently broken", to avoid confusion...
Pierre
-- seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files www.osukiss.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
