On 8/6/19 10:24 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Actually, it is not easy to test that: at a point in nasm life, or libvpx
life, a release allowed compiling libvpx against nasm again, and now you see
that. But owing to the heavy work on updating the book, it is too time
consuming to test that all packages work against all their dependencies,
specially when those dependencies have been disabled...
Then.. lets consider I tested it, ;)
May I suggest to update book, keeping "yasm requirement" and
removing "currently broken", to avoid confusion...
OK. I'll do that at my next commit.
Please read my post!
I did. What specifically?
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
