On 08/06/2019 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/6/19 10:24 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:Actually, it is not easy to test that: at a point in nasm life, or libvpx life, a release allowed compiling libvpx against nasm again, and now you see that. But owing to the heavy work on updating the book, it is too time consuming to test that all packages work against all their dependencies, specially when those dependencies have been disabled...Then.. lets consider I tested it, ;) May I suggest to update book, keeping "yasm requirement" and removing "currently broken", to avoid confusion...OK. I'll do that at my next commit.Please read my post!I did. What specifically? -- Bruce
To summerize my understanding of the URL Pierre gave. "better to compile libvpx with yasm, because a trouble with firefox" But this give no objective data about the kind of "trouble" (which will be in firefox)I still suggest to remove "currently broken" as it wasn't/(can't be?) described and cannot be confirmed.
-- seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files www.osukiss.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
