On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
>  The problem with x264 is that it's always a snapshot.  For people
> using today's ffmpeg snapshot, today's x264 probably works.  For
> people using a released version of ffmpeg, who knows.  That's why
> I've mentioned a specific "known to work" snapshot of x264 o nthe
> ffmpeg page.
Well, I personally think that x264 should go into the book mainly
because if the book says that a dep is required or recommended, it has
to be in the book. This is also why OpenJPEG should be in the book as
well (it's listed as recommended for Poppler).

-- 
William Immendorf
The ultimate in free computing.
Messages in plain text, please, no HTML.
GPG key ID: 1697BE98
If it's not signed, it's not from me.

--------------

"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to