Simon Geard wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:50 -0500, Michael Shell wrote: >> Maybe in the future there will be a demand for a LFS level between >> LFS and BLFS. (e.g., no Gnome or KDE stuff, except for a few basic >> libraries required by many non-Gnome applications) > > Problem is, that's a *very* hazy line. Both glib and gtk+ are Gnome > packages - developed by the same people, released on the same schedules. > But they're also used by packages like gvim that don't use any of the > rest of Gnome. So do they go in the BLFS-Gnome book, or the basic one?
That's my problem too. I once thought that BLFS should be broken up, but the dependencies made the packages just too interrelated. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
