On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:50:09PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Ken. And yes, BLFS has become a dependency beast, but not
> because BLFS has really changed, it is all the upstream devs that think
> adding additional functionality (and thus more dependencies) make their
> packages better (and they probably do).

 The big problem is that everyone building their own desktop really
needs to check dependencies every few months - I've certainly noticed
some things in the past few weeks where I could change my build order.

 I think it's about a year since I last reviewed that - apart from the
changes for "whichever version of gnome we're currently using" - ;-)
If the book was mostly up to date, this would of course be easier.
> 
> It is almost "work" now to build a pure BLFS desktop. There are just so
> many dependencies.

 For myself, I've never built a pure BLFS desktop - my preferred wm
(icewm) isn't covered, I never install docs if I have to take extra
steps and don't expect to use them, only occasionally bother to run
testsuites, lots of the packages in BLFS have no interest to me, and
I get rid of static libs in one way or another.  And that's before
the things I *want* which aren't in BLFS.  Oh, and some of my
previous suggestions such as the mozilla png patch are still in BLFS
but not in my own builds - times change.  But yes, starting from a
previous version - either your own, or just a previous BLFS *is* work.

> The servers aren't so bad, but desktop utilities have
> just grown enormously. I like the approach that the unixODBC folks went
> with. They yanked out all the Qt and Testing Framework stuff and created
> new packages. This solves circular dependencies.
> 

 When I was looking at that last month (it was a dependency of
something that used openssl), I couldn't find any releases for the
testing stuff.
> Oh well, sorry for the rant.
> 
> -- 
 :-)

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to