On 08/29/2012 03:30 AM, alex lupu wrote: > Armin: > > You seem to be in conflict with the BLFS statement: > > Warning > You may notice that there are several newer version of libdrm available > upstream. However, we do not recommend using any later version than this > one if you are going to build MesaLib-8.0.4 using BLFS instructions. > > which is as clear as can be (i.e., you shouldn't use libdrm other than > _this_ one, 2.4.33, if you intend to build MesaLib-8.0.4 BLFS-wise). > > If you don't agree with it, _correct_ this Warning as you like, rather than > showing a lack of, say, maturity in copying my OP in its entirety. > (one of Linux problems, by the way). > A simple, > "I have no idea why you wrote such story" should have sufficed. > > Cheers, > -- Alex >
Yay, I'm criticised for the stuff I wrote just to satisfy everyone's needs. Page clearly says "If you build MesaLib per _BLFS instructions_" ... You are always welcome to modify them! Only nouveau is the part where it fails with newer libdrm, everything else works there ... Thank you very much. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
