On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:23:38PM -0700, Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
> Having multiple parts of the book being split up and teams working on
> each part is a good idea in my opinion.
>
Except at the moment we have one small team and in general people
pick things they think they can handle. In my case, a lot of the
things I care about are spread throughout the 'Basic' and 'Advanced'
parts, and I'm sure the other editors will say the same. So I'm not
convinced that separate teams is going to work.
For the moment I'm mostly stepping aside, as previously noted.
I hope to keep an eye on firefox (past experience suggests that
trying to pick up the new version only when it is released is too
painful), and almost every release has CVE fiexes, even 61.0 did
(although those were not initially in the Release Notes).
Eventually I hope to be able to devote a bit more time to this, but
for the next few months that is now less likely.
But the big problems as I see them are:
· lack of people building the development book and finding issues
· lack of people willing and able to edit
And of those, the second is the greater problem.
So, since we are now hopefully looking at longer-term changes,
anybody else got other suggestions for changed format/process ?
Please ?
ĸen
--
Keyboard not found, Press F1 to continue
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
