How in the world that get in your computer? That's a list I'm subscribed to! Weirdness! Your bro in Christ, Lino Morales and Louie Lab Email and Windows Live Messenger: [email protected] Skype lino_and_louie Twitter: www.twitter.com/lino_and_louie For Blind Christian Men, visit: http://morales-family.lljfm.net/mailman/listinfo/blindmen4christ_morales-family to subscribe to Blind Men For Christ. And check out our site at: www.lljfm.net where you'll find our blog and other links. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rogelio Terrazas" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 4:59 PM Subject: [Blind-Computing] Removing File
I am having trouble removing a file or program in my Control Panel. It says it cannot remove because it cannot find the installer package. I look for any file with the same name in the search and I cannot find [email protected]> for <[email protected]>; Fri, 8 May 2009 01:57:11 +0000 Message-ID: <cbe2bb183c6c407b8c7fe2f6f98d8...@lenovouserpc> From: "Jeanne Sanders" <[email protected]> To: "Blind-Conservative" <[email protected]> References: <20e613473b7d4286a670babbbd45c...@russpc> In-Reply-To: <20e613473b7d4286a670babbbd45c...@russpc> Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 21:03:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-Spam-Flag: NO Subject: Re: [Blind-conservative] Two Achilles' Heels X-BeenThere: [email protected] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11.cp3 Precedence: list Reply-To: Blind-Conservative <[email protected]> List-Id: Blind-Conservative <blind-conservative_emissives.com.emissives.com> List-Unsubscribe: <http://emissives.com/mailman/options/blind-conservative_emissives.com>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://emissives.com/mailman/listinfo/blind-conservative_emissives.com>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: [email protected] Errors-To: [email protected] X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - world.globalcybercity.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lljfm.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - emissives.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 X-Spam-Score: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-Spam-Flag: NO X-EsetId: 9AC0BA2594DE1D38CF80 X-EsetScannerBuild: 4875 This is one of The best articles I have read in a long time. He is right on target. > Two Achilles' Heels > By: Dr. Mark W. Hendrickson > Thursday, May 07, 2009 > Two sore spots could sink this administration. > In my recent article "Checkmate," I made the case that President Obama's > grand strategy > has outfoxed the opposition, dooming us all to a massive increase in the > scope and > power of Uncle Sam. Is the situation hopeless? Never! If Americans who > believe in > individual liberty and free markets rally to the cause, then we may some > day look > back on the current gloomy period as the Valley Forge winter of a new > American revolution. > The Achilles' heel of Obama is most likely the hubris that is common to > those who > seek "nothing less than the total transformation" of a society ("of our > economy," > were Obama's exact words). In their consuming desire to be the Great > Leader, such > individuals shed restraint and grab impatiently for more power. In a > society where > people prize their individual rights and retain a residual distrust of Big > Government, > overreaching may prove to be Obama's fatal strategic miscalculation. > In recent decades, Americans have been like frogs in the chef's pot. Just > as frogs > don't realize they are being boiled alive when the heat is turned up > gradually, we > Americans have been lulled into passivity by the gradual, decades-long > expansion > of government power. If we don't wake up and jump out of the cauldron, we, > like the > frogs, will be doomed-in our case, by losing our freedom and prosperity to > socialistic > Big Brother. Obama's bold power grabs are startling us, waking us out of > our torpor, > giving rise to tea parties, righteous indignation, and a renewed will to > resist the > encroachments of tyranny. > Let's get the "s" word out of the closet and into the open. I abhor > name-calling, > and have never labeled President Obama a socialist-even after I heard > through the > grapevine that some Democrats were describing him as such at Washington > cocktail > parties. But since socialism is the specific term for government ownership > of various > commercial enterprises, it is impossible to not view Obama's agenda as > overtly socialistic > in tendency. > Consider: > He clearly wants and is working for a government-run health-care system. > He has proposed guaranteed universal college educations for every young > American. > He wants to create new "volunteer" service programs that sound > suspiciously like > a draft to compel young adults to work for government. > He has asserted greater government control over the auto industry by > demanding (and > securing) the ouster of General Motors CEO Rick Waggoner. > His Treasury Secretary is proposing new powers that would enable the > government to > nationalize banks, insurance companies, and other financial entities. > And now his Interior Secretary seeks increased taxation of American oil > companies-even > though Big Oil has paid more in taxes to government in recent decades than > they have > retained in profits-on the grounds that Uncle Sam receives a lower share > of oil and > gas revenue compared to governments in other countries. Well, of course > other countries' > governments derive a higher percentage of revenue from oil and gas > production-after > all, the 15 or so oil companies that are larger than our largest, > ExxonMobil, are > all state-owned oil companies. The only possible way Uncle Sam could equal > the share > taken by those foreign governments would be to nationalize American oil > companies. > Obama won't go that far (yet), but he clearly intends to play central > planner and > radically restructure the domestic energy complex. > If Obama doesn't scale back his audacious power grab, the American people > may turn > on him. Where might such a tipping point be? I'll place my bet on > cap-and-trade. > Cap-and-trade is Obama's scheme to charge big bucks to companies for > permission to > use carbon dioxide-emitting coal, oil, and natural gas-fees that will be > passed on > to the American consumer. If cap-and-trade becomes law, vast numbers of > Americans > of modest means will be angry if the costs of driving their cars, heating > their homes, > and paying their electric bills soar. They will feel conned when they > realize that > Obama's promise not to raise taxes on them referred only to direct, > explicit taxes, > and not to indirect taxes that raise their cost of living. Cap-and-trade > is Obama's > make-or-break issue. If he restrains himself from ramming a cap-and-trade > program > through Congress, then he may get most of the power he seeks; if not, he > will be > vulnerable. > Obama's other Achilles' heel will be his conduct of foreign affairs. He > seems to > believe that his personal charm is so forceful that he can talk enemies > into beating > their swords into plowshares. In doing so, he risks repeating the tragedy > of Jimmy > Carter whose Lennonist philosophy (that is, "Lennonist"-not Leninist-as in > Beatle > John Lennon's motto "all you need is love") was rewarded with contemptuous > aggression > by the Soviets, the ayatollahs, and that ilk. If the response to Obama's > apologetic > America-debasing groveling is a lethal attack on American interests, > especially a > domestic incident, then the spell of the Obama personality cult will be > broken, and > support for his socialistic agenda will shrink drastically. > Either of Obama's Achilles' heels will hand the Republican Party a > magnificent opportunity > to present an alternative agenda that resonates with the American people. > In my opinion, > Republicans will win more support if they stop playing the party of Big > Government > to the Democrats' party of Bigger Government, and offer a clear contrast > by making > themselves the party of Smaller Government. We have to hope that they > aspire to something > more than simply being at the helm when the ship of state cracks up on the > rocks > of national bankruptcy. > Dr. Mark W. Hendrickson is a faculty member, economist, and contributing > scholar > with the Center for Vision and Values at Grove City College. > _______________________________________________ > Blind-conservative mailing list > [email protected] > http://emissives.com/mailman/listinfo/blind-conservative_emissives.com > _______________________________________________ Blind-conservative mailing list [email protected] http://emissives.com/mailman/listinfo/blind-conservative_emissives.com For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit: http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
