Thanks Bob and Dale.  Yeah, it's a real dilemma for me.  My wife has her
laundry plant in the basement, and the basement's really the only place it's
convenient for me to do work.  We have an old garage, but there's no
electrical service, and it's just not a pleasant place to work.  Maybe if I
get a chop saw, which I think would actually be adequate, it'll just have to
live out in the garage on extension cords during the warmer months, though
having a good positive dust collection system without having to run a noisey
vac would sure be nice in the basement.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dale Leavens
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 5:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Chop saws was: miter boxes

 

So far as I know these saws are about as bad as it gets for dust control. I
suppose with enough vacuum anything is possible but the overhead nature of
the saw means that the teeth lift dust arcing into the air. Some actually
does make it's way into the dust bags but much of it flies all over the
place, mostly away from the operator.

I built a cabinet with a hemicircular sort of baffle with a 4 inch hole in
the bottom and a 1100 cu.ft. dust collector behind that as well as a tube
from the dust port on the saw into that hole and it still doesn't collect
all the dust.It does contain it so I can blow or brush much of it toward the
extraction hole at intervals. Maybe a tent over the lot with a sleeve to
accept the operators arm I don't know.

The main disadvantage to a chop saw is the depth and width of cut, the
capacity. If that meets your needs though they are quite cost effective.

Now that dust control is becoming more of interest they may begin adding
direct powered dust extraction right at the blade but I am not aware of that
on any units yet.

Dale Leavens, Cochrane Ontario Canada
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:DLeavens%40puc.net> net
Skype DaleLeavens
Come and meet Aurora, Nakita and Nanook at our polar bear habitat.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: William Stephan 
To: blindhandyman@ <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 3:44 PM
Subject: RE: [BlindHandyMan] Chop saws was: miter boxes

All:

The time has come again to think about some kind of stationary saw. So, I'm
thinking a chop saw might do pretty much all I need. I have some memories
of these, but this is 25 plus years ago. My recollection is that these were
made with a sort of tub you actually did your cutting in. And, if that's
right, it would seem you could control dust easier with that kind of set up
than with a normal table saw.

Am I remembering this right? And, is it in fact easier to control dust with
one of these?

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: blindhandyman@ <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com [mailto:blindhandyman@
<mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:spiro%40netaxs.com> com
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 2:33 AM
To: blindhandyman@ <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] miter boxes

I need to replace mine. I don't see chop-saw money here anytime soon.
The one I have is actually plasticand has served for just under 10 years.
Are there some that are especially worth paying considerably more? 
Something metal, with adjustments?
Curious.

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Bob Kennedy wrote:

> They are fine as a guide. Although you can get away without one, you need
to use a back saw with a miter box because it is stiffer and won't flex when
cutting.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Shane Hecker
> To: blindhandyman@ <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 12:53 AM
> Subject: [BlindHandyMan] miter boxes
>
>
> What do you think of the miter boxes? Has anyone used them? Just wondering
> as my mother's husband got me one.
>
> Shane
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to