The TAG review link is missing but I see you've got one in progress here: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1033
Regarding the tests: > https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-shapes/shape-functions?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=shape > (anything beginning with shape-) > https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-masking/clip-path?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=shape > and > https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-masking/clip-path/animations?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=shape > (clip-path-shape-*) I am trying to understand why these are still mostly failing in Chrome Experimental. The CSSShapeFunction flag<https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/renderer/platform/runtime_enabled_features.json5;l=1298;drc=ccbd95cddb03e806973adedb303cceeae0824c23> has status "experimental" so I'd expect it to be enabled for the Chrome Experimental WPT results, but in the links you shared most of the subtests for shape() still don't pass. Are the tests or implementation still in flux, or do you know of something else I might be missing here? As a sidenote, Firefox also seems to have done some work on this: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1823463. Some but not all of the tests are passing on Firefox Nightly. -- Dan Clark From: blink-dev@chromium.org <blink-dev@chromium.org> On Behalf Of Chromestatus Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 11:42 AM To: blink-dev@chromium.org Cc: nrosent...@chromium.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS shape() function Contact emails nrosent...@chromium.org<mailto:nrosent...@chromium.org> Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-2/#shape-function Summary shape() allows responsive custom shapes in CSS properties that accept a shape, currently limited to clip-path. It lets the author define a series of commands, equivalent to the commands in path(), but where the commands accept responsive units (e.g. % or vw), as well as any CSS values such as custom properties or rather than pixel-values. See https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-2/#shape-function Blink component Blink>CSS<https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ECSS%22> TAG review None TAG review status Pending Risks Interoperability and Compatibility None Gecko: No signal (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1153) WebKit: Positive (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238371) Safari has already implemented this, available in STP. Web developers: Positive See citations: https://jamesmcgrath.net/scaling-svg-clippath/ https://css-tricks.com/unfortunately-clip-path-path-is-still-a-no-go/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29495919/how-to-apply-clippath-to-a-div-with-the-clippath-position-being-relative-to-the https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31210466/convert-svg-path-data-to-0-1-range-to-use-as-clippath-with-objectboundingbox https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53618192/create-responsive-svg-clip-path-making-svg-path-responsive Other signals: WebView application risks Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? None Debuggability None Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? Yes Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests<https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>? Yes https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-shapes/shape-functions?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=shape (anything beginning with shape-) https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-masking/clip-path?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=shape and https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-masking/clip-path/animations?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=shape (clip-path-shape-*) Flag name on about://flags CSSShapeFunction Finch feature name CSSShapeFunction Requires code in //chrome? False Tracking bug https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40829059 Estimated milestones Shipping on desktop 135 DevTrial on desktop 134 Shipping on Android 135 DevTrial on Android 134 Shipping on WebView 135 Anticipated spec changes Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way). None Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status https://chromestatus.com/feature/5172258539307008?gate=5143998661132288 Links to previous Intent discussions Intent to Prototype: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6759c7eb.2b0a0220.2dfede.0004.GAE%40google.com This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status<https://chromestatus.com/>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org<mailto:blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org>. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/67914a1a.2b0a0220.236503.0179.GAE%40google.com<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/67914a1a.2b0a0220.236503.0179.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CH4PR00MB23297C2F6162860C741929B7C5E02%40CH4PR00MB2329.namprd00.prod.outlook.com.
