> >>> - https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10647 >>> >>> This one is not actionable and doesn't affect shape(), it's about path(). >> > > I think "not actionable > <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/actionable>" isn't a great > way to describe this issue: Lea's suggesting that this functionality be > provided as part of the `path()` function and that `shape()` not be defined > at this time. That's a concrete action that affects `shape()`. >
My bad, I mixed it with #9889 <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9889>. it does affect `shape()` as in proposing to do something else instead, which is described in general terms (which is what I mean by "not actionable", I should have been more specific). It is based on issue #9889 <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9889> that has been closed in favor of `shape()`. A discussion about this issue at TPAC (see on the issue) also didn't produce anything specific/actionable, and Lea failed to raise support for doing something other than `shape()`. In the meantime `shape()` was spec'd, had its details fleshed to the last WPT, and implemented in Safari. I asked Lea on the issue if she still wants to pursue this alternative approach. It's up to the API owners what to do with this information - my view is that this ship has sailed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJn%3DMYYwkaup89dwevRt9jGQxzFSmicmc%3D1Hh%3D_vDMmBHv%3DQ4w%40mail.gmail.com.
