On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 8:51 PM Noam Rosenthal <nrosent...@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >>>> - https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10647 >>>> >>>> This one is not actionable and doesn't affect shape(), it's about >>> path(). >>> >> >> I think "not actionable >> <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/actionable>" isn't a great >> way to describe this issue: Lea's suggesting that this functionality be >> provided as part of the `path()` function and that `shape()` not be defined >> at this time. That's a concrete action that affects `shape()`. >> > > My bad, I mixed it with #9889 > <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9889>. it does affect > `shape()` as in proposing to do something else instead, which is described > in general terms (which is what I mean by "not actionable", I should have > been more specific). > > Update: I'm working through this issue to gain clarity about whether it contains any objections that should change something about the `shape()` feature, and will update here when this is resolved. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJn%3DMYa72taqTpk16wSXQ%2BJG2ZLVeLaL5P9-3TGOMPMqQnVHFA%40mail.gmail.com.
