On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:48 AM, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's interesting -- Mark, do you have any input on the topic? > > I'm having trouble parsing the above -- is the concern that some people > might believe that any link in the headers *has* to be mirrored in the > content? If so, that's the first time I've heard this brought up, and it > certainly isn't the intent. We can clarify if necessary. Nope, I was just trying to point out - all be it with some rather awful grammar - that when a new link type is defined, it can be used in any of the places links can be used; i.e, in <head>, <atom:link/>, or Link header (or draft-nottingham-site-meta). ~ Theo -- Theo Zourzouvillys Chief Technical Officer VoIP.co.uk - Commerce House, Telford Road, Bicester, OX26 4LD Tel: +44 1908 764 196 _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
