Ah - got it. Yes, that's the intent, and hopefully more places besides.
Cheers,
On 11/12/2008, at 4:59 PM, Theo Zourzouvillys wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:48 AM, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
That's interesting -- Mark, do you have any input on the topic?
I'm having trouble parsing the above -- is the concern that some
people
might believe that any link in the headers *has* to be mirrored in
the
content? If so, that's the first time I've heard this brought up,
and it
certainly isn't the intent. We can clarify if necessary.
Nope, I was just trying to point out - all be it with some rather
awful grammar - that when a new link type is defined, it can be used
in any of the places links can be used; i.e, in <head>, <atom:link/>,
or Link header (or draft-nottingham-site-meta).
~ Theo
--
Theo Zourzouvillys
Chief Technical Officer
VoIP.co.uk - Commerce House, Telford Road, Bicester, OX26 4LD
Tel: +44 1908 764 196
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
_______________________________________________
BLISS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
