I agree - I would like something to be said about it.

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Francois Audet
> Sent: 28 April 2009 16:13
> To: Michael Procter; Hutton, Andrew
> Cc: [email protected]; Scott Orton
> Subject: Re: [BLISS] Comments 
> ondraft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04(AutoRetrieve proposal)
> 
> Basically, I think a CallPark without an autoretrieve is
> effectively an "unsafe" feature, since it will result in
> users (typically customers) to wait forever in the 
> parking space. 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Procter [mailto:[email protected]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 02:00
> > To: Hutton, Andrew
> > Cc: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); [email protected]; Orton, 
> > Scott (RICH1:B620)
> > Subject: Re: [BLISS] Comments on 
> > draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04(AutoRetrieve proposal)
> > 
> > 2009/4/28 Hutton, Andrew <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > I agree with Francois it would I assume be the Referred-by 
> > header that 
> > > contains the URI of the park server and as long as the UA 
> can match 
> > > this against it's local configuration then this will be ok.
> > 
> > That would probably be more straightforward.  But it assumes 
> > a particular way of achieving the feature.
> > 
> > > I do think we should have a short description of the 
> auto-retrieve 
> > > procedure including an example message flow in the draft.
> > 
> > I'm still not entirely convinced that it belongs in this 
> > draft, although I agree it is an important aspect to consider 
> > in an implementation.  I'm also not sure that it is within 
> > scope for BLISS, given that it does seem to be trying to 
> > standardise a feature over and above the level needed for 
> > 'basic interoperability'.
> > 
> > However, I am open to persuasion!  To that end, I'd 
> > appreciate contributions of text / message flows.
> > 
> > Michael
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> BLISS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
> 
_______________________________________________
BLISS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss

Reply via email to